Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) in its current form might not be acceptable to service users from a variety of backgrounds. Therefore, it makes sense to adapt CBT when working with diverse populations. Contributors to this special issue of the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist have tackled the issues around the cultural adaptation of CBT from various perspectives, using a variety of methods, and have addressed topics ranging from cultural adaptation to improving access to CBT. Here, I briefly summarize and discuss the papers in this special issue. I start with a systematic review of CBT for social anxiety across cultures. Seven articles cover aspects of adaptation of therapies for people from different backgrounds. Three papers discuss the issues of gender and sexuality when using CBT, while another three papers focus on refugees, asylum seekers and the homeless, and two papers describe the application of CBT with religious populations. Finally, there are seven papers on issues related to service delivery, practice and training and supervision when working with a diverse population. Collectively, papers in this special issue provide us with sufficient evidence that cultural considerations play a vital role when using CBT, offer practical suggestions for improving cultural competence and most importantly, can catalyse future research. However, the full potential of culturally adapted interventions will not be realized until and unless access to CBT is improved. Therefore, there is a need to build robust evidence to convince funders, policy makers and service managers.
The UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) universal declaration on cultural diversity defines culture as ‘the set of distinctive spiritual, material, intellectual and emotional features of society or a social group, and that it encompasses, in addition to art and literature, lifestyles, ways of living together, value systems, traditions and beliefs’ (UNESCO, 2001). The term sub-culture is used to refer to minority cultures within a broader dominant culture. This declaration asserts that cultural pluralism pre-supposes respect for human rights. Most importantly, this definition does not limit culture to race, religion or nationality, thus recognizing cultural aspects of groups based on gender, gender preferences, age and disabilities. These values underpin the principle of cultural adaptation of evidence-based psychosocial interventions for people from diverse cultural and sub-cultural backgrounds.
Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), like most modern psychotherapies, is underpinned by the European-American values (Hays and Iwamasa, Reference Hays and Iwamasa 2006; Naeem et al., Reference Naeem, Phiri, Rathod and Ayub 2019; Stone et al., Reference Stone, Beck, Hashempour and Thwaites 2018). CBT involves exploration and attempts to modify core beliefs. Core beliefs, underlying assumptions and even the content of automatic thoughts vary across cultures (Sahin and Sahin, Reference Sahin and Sahin 1992; Tam et al., Reference Tam, Wong, Chow, Ng, Ng, Cheung and Mak 2007). Cultural and sub-cultural background also influence beliefs about wellbeing, causes of illness and its cure, help-seeking behaviours, healing systems and even the healers (Altweck et al., Reference Altweck, Marshall, Ferenczi and Lefringhausen 2015; Bhugra, Reference Bhugra 2006; Bhugra and Bhui, Reference Bhugra and Bhui 1998; Hagmayer and Engelmann, Reference Hagmayer and Engelmann 2014).
CBT research until recently has primarily focused on white, middle-class, well-educated service users, who are of European-American identities (Suinn, Reference Suinn 2003). It is not common practice to report participant’s cultural or religious background in CBT research. Even when the participant’s background is reported, a broader term such as White, Asian or Black is used, ignoring variations among these groups. Similarly, researchers do not record information concerning participants’ sexual orientation (Bowen and Boehmer, Reference Bowen and Boehmer 2007).
Culturally adapting CBT is the only way access to this evidence-based therapy can be improved for marginalized communities in Europe and North America and for the local population outside of these regions where more than 80% of the world population lives. It is heartening to see this field grow over the past decade to the extent that it found its place in a special edition of a highly prestigious journal. This special edition, therefore, is a welcome addition to a fast-growing area in CBT research and practice: ‘the cultural adaptation of CBT’.
This special issue addresses a variety of problems, populations and psychotherapies. I have tried to divide these articles according to the broader themes, although most articles will fit in more than one thematic area. There is (a) one systematic review of CBT for social anxiety among the culturally diverse population (Jankowska, Reference Jankowska 2019). There are (b) seven articles covering different aspects of adaptation of therapies for diverse populations which include: culturally adapted family intervention using case studies (Berry et al., Reference Berry, Day, Mulligan, Seed, Degnan and Edge 2018), a discussion of maladaptive schema and schema therapy in the context of Greek culture (Kolonia et al., Reference Kolonia, Tsartsara and Giakoumaki 2019), use of a transdiagnostic intervention in low resource countries (Murray et al., Reference Murray, Haroz, Pullmann, Dorsey, Kane, Augustinavicius and Bolton 2019), application of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) with a Turkish population in London (Perry et al., Reference Perry, Gardener, Oliver, Taş and Özenç 2019), a framework to culturally adapt CBT (Rathod et al., Reference Rathod, Phiri and Naeem 2019), a case report of family-based CBT for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) from Saudi Arabia (Alatiq and Alrshoud, Reference Alatiq and Alrshoud 2018) and a paper discussing CBT in military culture (Zwiebach et al., Reference Zwiebach, Lannert, Sherrill, McSweeney, Sprang, Goodnight and Rauch 2019). Three papers (c) address the issues of gender and sexuality. One paper discusses the application of dialectical behaviour therapy (DBT) with LGBTQ service users (Skerven et al., Reference Skerven, Whicker and LeMaire 2019), another describes a case series of vaginismus therapy in Tunisia (Zgueb et al., Reference Zgueb, Ouali, Achour, Jomli and Nacef 2019), while the third paper reports use of behaviour therapy when working with gender and sexual minorities in the context of Islamic culture (Langroudi and Skinta, Reference Langroudi and Skinta 2019). Three papers (d) focus on refugees, asylum seekers and the homeless. One paper describes a practice protocol for dissociative symptoms (Chessell et al., Reference Chessell, Brady, Akbar, Stevens and Young 2019), another describes the use of CBT with asylum seekers (King and Said, Reference King and Said 2019), and the third paper describes CBT with Mexican homeless girls (Castaños-Cervantes, Reference Castaños-Cervantes 2019). Two papers (e) focus on CBT for two religious groups, i.e. Orthodox Jews and Muslims (Kada, Reference Kada 2019; Mir et al., Reference Mir, Ghani, Meer and Hussain 2019). Finally, this special issue publishes seven articles (f) on issues related to service delivery, practice, training and supervision when working with a diverse population. The first article discusses the need for service change to improve access to culturally adapted therapy (Beck and Naz, Reference Beck and Naz 2019). The second article describes an evaluation of the transition from the Black, Asian and minority ethnic (BME) community mental health worker to the IAPT low-intensity psychological wellbeing practitioner (Hakim et al., Reference Hakim, Thompson and Coleman-Oluwabusola 2019). The third article discusses issues of race, cthnicity and culture in CBT to support therapists and service managers to deliver culturally competent therapy (Naz et al., Reference Naz, Gregory and Bahu 2019). The fourth article emphasizes understanding a client’s experience of racism as part of the assessment, formulation and treatment (Beck, Reference Beck 2019). The fifth study reports findings from a qualitative study of therapists’ experience of CBT training in Tanzania (Stone and Warren, Reference Stone and Warren 2011). Finally, two papers describe the importance of self-reflection, self-practice and supervision (Brooks, Reference Brooks 2019) and therapist self-disclosure (Phiri et al., Reference Phiri, Rathod, Gobbi, Carr and Kingdon 2019).
I will now briefly consider each of the papers in this special issue of the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, providing a short summary of each paper, followed by a discussion, including suggestions on further enhancing our understanding of cultural issue related to CBT and on further promoting CBT across cultures and the subcultures.
This systematic review reports case studies, as there were no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in this area. The review focuses on seven case studies of cultural adaptations of CBT for social anxiety disorder (SAD) for a culturally diverse population published separately. The treatment outcomes were generally promising in all cases, reporting a significant decrease of SAD symptoms, which were maintained over time. The success of therapy was attributed to the culturally specific modifications. However, the authors point out that there was little discussion or consideration given to other, non-culture-related factors that could potentially contribute to the success of therapy. Case studies in this review were reported from the USA and Japan. The authors concluded that CBT can be an acceptable and effective treatment for culturally diverse SAD sufferers with ‘modest’ modifications, and that applying them increases the treatment compliance and its outcomes, although they issue caution based on the quality of reporting and multiple methodological issues.
The assertion that the expression of social anxiety is influenced by social and cultural factors (Hofmann et al., Reference Hofmann, Asnaani and Hinton 2010) has common sense appeal. While lower prevalence rates of SAD are reported from some non-Western cultures (Hofmann et al., Reference Hofmann, Asnaani and Hinton 2010), these might be due to individuals seeking help from practitioners of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine (Gureje et al., Reference Gureje, Nortje, Makanjuola, Oladeji, Seedat and Jenkins 2015). Reviewers report that therapists claimed that they practised cultural awareness and were open to discuss culture and were attentive to cultural norms as well as culture-specific expressions of SAD and the level of acculturation. However, therapy was not adapted using a systematic approach. Some examples of cultural sensitivity included: need to be aware of service user’s culture, language barriers and translations, level of acculturation, socio-cultural constructs, therapeutic relationship and style of therapy, which are in line with the existing literature (Hays and Iwamasa, Reference Hays and Iwamasa 2006; Hwang et al., Reference Hwang, Myers, Chiu, Mak, Butner, Fujimoto and Miranda 2015; Naeem et al., Reference Naeem, Phiri, Rathod and Ayub 2019; Organista and Muñoz, Reference Organista and Muñoz 1996; Ward and Brown, Reference Ward and Brown 2015). As the review included only a small number of case studies, it will be too early to draw any conclusions. However, findings from this review certainly draw attention to the need for more research in this area.
These authors pioneered cultural adaptation of a CBT-based family intervention for psychosis for African-Caribbean people in England, and found it to be feasible and acceptable (Edge et al., Reference Edge, Degnan, Cotterill, Berry, Baker, Drake and Abel 2018a,b). This paper reports on the process of culturally adapted family intervention from a therapist’s perspective. The authors report three cases to describe the therapy process, insights learned by therapists and compared those with the original model they developed. Therapists focused on cultural factors during assessment and engagement, shared learning, communication, coping skills and endings. In particular, it was possible to engage service users in family intervention for psychosis with and without biological family members.
People of African-Caribbean origin in the UK have a higher incidence of schizophrenia (Fearon et al., Reference Fearon, Kirkbride, Morgan, Dazzan, Morgan, Lloyd and Murray 2006), and are less likely to receive psychological therapies (Morgan et al., Reference Morgan, Dazzan, Morgan, Jones, Harrison, Leff and Fearon 2006). A qualitative study from Montreal to explore the reasons for the under-use of conventional mental health services by people of Caribbean origin reported that tendency of physicians to prescribe pills is a significant barrier. Psychological interventions, therefore, can play a vital role in engaging these clients. Family intervention reduces hospital admission, encourage compliance with medication, improves general social impairment and the levels of expressed emotion within the family (Pharoah et al., Reference Pharoah, Mari, Rathbone and Wong 2010), and therefore is recommended by NICE (NICE, 2014). Family interventions might be more appealing to people from collectivistic cultural backgrounds, and therefore the adaptation of family intervention for this group might improve access, engagement and thus outcomes. These findings confirm some of the findings from cultural adaptation of individual CBT for psychosis (Li et al., Reference Li, Zhang, Luo, Liu, Liu, Lin and Naeem 2017; Naeem et al., Reference Naeem, Habib, Gul, Khalid, Saeed, Farooq and Kingdon 2014; Naeem et al., Reference Naeem, Saeed, Irfan, Kiran, Mehmood, Gul and Kingdon 2015b; Rathod et al., Reference Rathod, Kingdon, Phiri and Gobbi 2010; Rathod et al., Reference Rathod, Phiri, Harris, Underwood, Thagadur, Padmanabi and Kingdon 2013), in particular the role played by trauma, coercive treatment and racism (Rathod et al., Reference Rathod, Kingdon, Phiri and Gobbi 2010). There is, however, a need to confirm the effectiveness of culturally adapted family interventions through fully powered RCTs. I also suggest that authors should consider replication of this model in other countries, especially non-Western countries.
This paper examines the Greek cultural, linguistic schema of Politeness Plural in the application of a Schema Therapy mode model. The authors argue that holding on to the ‘Politeness Plural linguistic schema’ may reinforce emotional distancing and might compromise schema healing. Schema Therapy emphasizes the need for creating a warm therapist–client relationship as a pre-requisite for schema healing. The authors advise that a schema therapist needs to remain inquisitive of potential maladaptive or/and internalized dysfunctional coping mechanisms of inter-relating that are masked by the use of the Politeness Plural linguistic schema. The authors suggest that any attempt at holding on to the Politeness Plural cultural, linguistic schema in the Greek-speaking culture employed by either the therapist or the client reinforces emotional distancing and prevents the therapy from working through those maladaptive coping and internalized dysfunctional mechanisms of self that perpetuate schemas on both.
Both verbal and non-verbal language plays a vital role in psychotherapeutic encounters. It has been proposed that our knowledge of language use can be used as a source of ‘technologies’ for investigating the process of psychotherapy (Russell, Reference Russell 1989). This interesting article provides food for thought for every therapist. The ideas proposed by the authors should also appeal to therapists from non-Western cultures. The t-v (tu-vos) distinctions are common around the globe and expressed in a variety of forms. In some non-Western cultures, these expressions are accompanied by a set of gestures, for example, lowering of eyes or head (Cultural Atlas, 2019). While egalitarian societies are subtle in acceptance of authority figures, in other societies showing respect for authority is a cultural norm and therefore hard to negotiate. A collaborative approach might not be acceptable across cultures. I agree with the assertion that these ideas need to be tested through qualitative and quantitative research.
Murray and colleagues ( Reference Murray, Haroz, Pullmann, Dorsey, Kane, Augustinavicius and Bolton 2019) present data from two previously conducted RCTs (Bolton et al., Reference Bolton, Lee, Haroz, Murray, Dorsey, Robinson and Bass 2014; Weiss et al., Reference Weiss, Murray, Zangana, Mahmooth, Kaysen, Dorsey and Bolton 2015) in which they tested a modular, multi-problem, transdiagnostic manual using the common elements treatment approach (CETA). Therapy was delivered by lay counsellors in Iraq and Thailand to treat trauma victims. The authors examined the fidelity and flexibility of treatment elements. They gathered information at multiple points using a variety of methods. The lay counsellors, under supervision, demonstrated high levels of fidelity to the intervention. The authors concluded that the lay counsellors delivered the intervention flexibly and were able to learn the decision-making processes of the therapy manual. The authors suggest more process research in the use of transdiagnostic therapy manuals in low- and middle-income countries.
Transdiagnostic mental health interventions have been tested in Uganda, Iraq, Thailand, Pakistan and India (Bolton et al., Reference Bolton, Lee, Haroz, Murray, Dorsey, Robinson and Bass 2014; Bonilla-Escobar et al., Reference Bonilla-Escobar, Fandiño-Losada, Martínez-Buitrago, Santaella-Tenorio, Tobón-García, Muñoz-Morales and Bolton 2018; Patel et al., Reference Patel, Weiss, Chowdhary, Naik, Pednekar, Chatterjee and Kirkwood 2010; Rahman et al., Reference Rahman, Hamdani, Awan, Bryant, Dawson, Khan and Ommeren 2016; Weiss et al., Reference Weiss, Murray, Zangana, Mahmooth, Kaysen, Dorsey and Bolton 2015). This approach is supported by the World Health Organization (WHO) as depicted in mhGAP (WHO, 2015), which promotes scaling up of evidence-based interventions and emphasizes the role of lay counsellors in delivering these interventions directly to the community members. These are commendable efforts. However, it is yet to be determined how sustainable these therapies are in the long term. So far, the uptake of these interventions into health systems has been low (Naeem et al., Reference Naeem, Rathod, Khan and Ayub 2016a). The mental health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LAMICs) are under-resourced, limited to big cities and fragmented (Rathod et al., Reference Rathod, Pinninti, Irfan, Gorczynski, Rathod, Gega and Naeem 2017). Not all the LAMICs are the same, with wide variations in terms of the level of education, resources and availability of trained therapists. The creation of a new workforce requiring additional funding might pose a barrier in uptake into the systems with low resources, or might not be necessary. There is a need to consider ways to deliver these interventions without putting extra demands on health systems while taking into consideration the available resource. Engaging local mental health professionals can play a vital role in this regard to understand the ground realities, rather than taking a public health approach. While the authors mention elements of cultural adaptation of the manual, no systematic attempts were made to adapt the manual culturally. This issue can be addressed in future research.
Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) is a trans-diagnostic intervention that has been tried both in the West and outside the West. This paper reports the cultural adaptation of ACT for the Turkish-speaking community in England. This study reports the results of post-intervention effects of a culturally adapted ACT group. The group intervention reduced depression, anxiety and emotional distress. Qualitative responses indicated that the culturally adapted ACT was feasible and acceptable. The authors describe the process of cultural adaptation in some detail, e.g. use of popular teachings and poems of Rumi, culturally familiar, non-technical language and video material from popular Turkish media and culturally syntonic translation of the therapy material.
Several attempts have been made at adapting third wave therapies (Cheng and Merrick, Reference Cheng and Merrick 2017; Fuchs et al., Reference Fuchs, Lee, Roemer and Orsillo 2013; Mercado and Hinojosa, Reference Mercado and Hinojosa 2017; Ramaiya et al., Reference Ramaiya, Fiorillo, Regmi, Robins and Kohrt 2017). Kenneth Fung has reported high levels of acceptance of ACT while working with the Cambodian community in Toronto (Fung, Reference Fung 2015). The notion that mindfulness-based therapies might be readily acceptable to people from a non-Western background has a common sense appeal. However, mindfulness might not be acceptable to everyone from outside the West due to religious or cultural reasons. Mindfulness-based approaches as practised in the West have also been criticized as either lacking the philosophical, theoretical or theological underpinning (Kirmayer, Reference Kirmayer 2015) or even being a tool misused by the capitalist West (Illing, Reference Illing 2019). Sufism, an equivalent of mindfulness in Islam, might be more acceptable for Muslim clients and is worth exploring in this context. Nevertheless, third wave therapies should be culturally adapted and tested. We hope for further research to test this adapted therapy against standard ACT, using improved design and adequately powered RCTs that focus on specific problems.
These authors describe an evidence-based framework that has evolved over a decade. Authors describe a staged process of culturally adapting CBT that takes into account stakeholder’s opinions and experiences to develop guidelines that can be used to adapt CBT for clients from a non-Western background culturally. They describe the ‘triple-A principle’ which describes foci of adaptation. These include ‘awareness’ of the service users’ culture, consideration of cultural issues during the ‘assessment and engagement phase’ and areas in therapy that need ‘adjustment’ for therapy to be effective.
There are multiple arguments in favour of adapting CBT for people from a diverse background (Sue et al., Reference Sue, Zane, Nagayama Hall and Berger 2009). While frameworks in the past were based on therapists’ personal experience, these authors have described a systematic approach to culturally adapt CBT that is based on evidence and has been tested through RCTs. This paper, therefore, is a welcome addition to the existing literature in the area. The authors have expanded on their work over a decade in developing a framework for cultural adaptation of CBT that can be replicated (Naeem et al., Reference Naeem, Phiri, Munshi, Rathod, Ayub, Gobbi and Kingdon 2015a; Naeem et al., Reference Naeem, Rathod, Khan and Ayub 2016a,b; Naeem et al., Reference Naeem, Phiri, Rathod and Ayub 2019; Rathod et al., Reference Rathod, Kingdon, Phiri and Gobbi 2010). The major limitation of this framework is that it focuses on CBT and might not be generalizable to other therapies.
This case report describes the application of CBT in dealing with family accommodation (defined as ‘how relatives, in particular parents, may assist in compulsive rituals, provide reassurance or modify their routines to alleviate or avoid the distress experienced by the obsessive-compulsive child’). The authors describe the mother of a 14-year-old female patient who carried out almost all the compulsive behaviours and rituals for her child. Family-based cognitive behavioural therapy was offered over 4 months with a successful treatment outcome. Exposure and response prevention was used to help the client. The authors concluded that if applied thoughtfully, CBT can be used for patients in Saudi Arabia.
Only limited literature is available on CBT with Arab clients (Kayrouz et al., Reference Kayrouz, Dear, Kayrouz, Karin, Gandy and Titov 2018). These authors suggest that young children cannot be treated without considering attachment patterns, the broader family system and cultural variables. However, they claim that in this case, the cultural context and the broader family system were not the primary factors in the development and maintenance of the problem. It is, however, envisaged that therapists shared the same cultural values as the client, might be mindful of these norms, and possibly delivered therapy in Arabic – some vital aspects of cultural adaptation. They suggest that educating service users on CBT plays a vital role in cultures where people, in general, are not aware of CBT. The finding that behavioural techniques need few adjustments and are almost culture free has been previously reported (Naeem et al., Reference Naeem, Gobbi, Ayub and Kingdon 2010).
These authors start by highlighting the need to recognize a ‘military culture’ in therapeutic encounters. They suggest that CBT compliments many aspects of military culture, for example agenda setting (emphasis on the daily structure), explicit goals for treatment (focus on mission completion) and focus on skill training (development of strengths). They also discuss the sub-cultures within the army, based on religion, race or gender, etc. The authors emphasize some of the salient features of military culture: the organizational structure of the military and its branches, a timeline of major wars and operations, the ranking hierarchy, and its language that should be considered in adapting therapy for this group. Finally, the authors list available resources in training in military culture for therapists.
Many authors have pointed to the uniqueness of military culture as being different from civilian culture, based on routines, structures, hierarchies and the dress codes, among many other attributes (Hall, Reference Hall 2011; Reger et al., Reference Reger, Etherage, Reger and Gregory 2008; Soeters et al., Reference Soeters, Winslow, Weibull and Caforio 2006). Military personnel share a common bond, feeling of unity and a sense of purpose and direction. Understanding military culture becomes even more critical for civilian mental health professionals who are providing help to military personnel or veterans. Very high rates of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety and psychological distress have been reported among army personnel and veterans (Hoge et al., Reference Hoge, Castro, Messer, McGurk, Cotting and Koffman 2004; Statistics Canada, 2014; Stevelink et al., Reference Stevelink, Malcolm, Mason, Jenkins, Sundin and Fear 2015). It is therefore surprising that only limited literature is available on the adaptation of psychotherapy with military personnel (Miller, Reference Miller 2010; Spoont et al., Reference Spoont, Sayer, Thuras, Erbes and Winston 2003). There is a need to adapt CBT for this group using a systematic approach.
Skerven et al. ( Reference Skerven, Whicker and LeMaire 2019) report adaptation of DBT to address the needs of service users with diverse gender identities and sexual orientations who have experienced sexual stigma. For sexual minorities, minority stress has been implicated as an increased risk of emotional and mental health disorders. This paper describes combining DBT with a sexual stigma model (Herek et al., Reference Herek, Gillis and Cogan 2009) for LGBTQ+ service users receiving therapy for borderline personality disorders. Authors believe combining these two paradigms can help LGBTQ+ service users in effectively interacting with this population. The authors provide case examples. They suggest more empirical research in this field.
DBT combined techniques from behaviour therapy and Zen Buddhism (Reddy and Vijay, Reference Reddy and Vijay 2017) and was developed to help suicidal behaviours among borderline personality disorder service users (Linehan et al., Reference Linehan, Armstrong, Suarez, Allmon and Heard 1991). There is evidence to suggest that DBT is an effective treatment (Méndez-Bustos et al., Reference Méndez-Bustos, Calati, Rubio-Ramírez, Olié, Courtet and Lopez-Castroman 2019; Panos et al., Reference Panos, Jackson, Hasan and Panos 2014). A Cochrane Review reported that DBT reduces the frequency of repetition of self-harm, although no differences were observed in the proportion of patients repeating self-harm or other outcomes such as suicidal ideation and depression (Hawton et al., Reference Hawton, Witt, Taylor Salisbury, Arensman, Gunnell, Hazell and van Heeringen 2016). Stigma and discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity have a severe impact on the mental health of LGBTQ+ people (Meyer, Reference Meyer 2003). Despite very high rates of mental health problems and suicidal behaviours, the LGBTQ+ community faces numerous barriers in accessing mental healthcare (Veltman and Chaimowitz, Reference Veltman and Chaimowitz 2014). This paper highlights a gap and provides the way forward in working with a highly stigmatized group.
This paper describes the use of CBT with four patients with vaginismus in Tunisia. All these patients had a strict religious upbringing and had dysfunctional beliefs underpinned by their cultural and religious values. The authors describe culturally adapted techniques they used to make therapy compatible with the local cultural context. They argue that family systems, religion and local cultural beliefs should all be taken into consideration when providing culturally adapted CBT.
In addition to describing the culturally adapted CBT techniques, the authors highlight the issues of gender discrimination and female sexuality in Muslim countries (Gouda and Potrafke, Reference Gouda and Potrafke 2016). Culture, religion and spirituality influence the belief systems of people, including beliefs about illness, its causes and treatment (Cinnirella and Loewenthal, Reference Cinnirella and Loewenthal 1999; Ismail et al., Reference Ismail, Wright, Rhodes and Small 2005; Razali et al., Reference Razali, Khan and Hasanah 1996). The authors describe dealing with religious and cultural beliefs, and the role played by the family, engaging family members in therapy, dealing with shame and guilt, and local practices, such as magic rituals. They also highlight the culturally sensitive practice of involving faith or religious healers in therapy (Kada, Reference Kada 2019; Mir et al., Reference Mir, Ghani, Meer and Hussain 2019; Naeem et al., Reference Naeem, Phiri, Munshi, Rathod, Ayub, Gobbi and Kingdon 2015a).
The number of Muslims migrating to Europe and North America has increased over the last decade. Gender and sexual minorities (GSM) are over-represented in the migrating population. This population is at an increased risk of emotional and mental health problems. The authors discuss the impact of minority stress, shame and migration stress in this group. They also discuss the integration of ACT and compassion-focused therapy (CFT) in helping this population. The authors suggest that ACT and CFT may provide a practical framework for a culturally adapted therapy that targets the needs of those experiencing intersectional LGBTQ+ and Muslim identities.
The attitudes towards LGBTQ+ in Muslim countries have been influenced by religion and Islamic jurisprudence, as well their social, political and cultural history. Same-sex relationships were generally tolerated in pre-modern Islamic societies. Homoerotic themes were prevalent in poetry and other literary genres written in major languages of the Muslim world from the eighth century into the modern era (El-Rouayheb, Reference El-Rouayheb 2005). However, prejudice towards this community worsened in the Islamic world, possibly due to the European laws during the colonial period and the rise of Islamist fundamentalism in the 1980s (The Economist, 2018). These authors have touched on a highly sensitive issue in a very skilful, diligent and empathic manner. They have presented a succinct rationale for the use of ACT and CFT to help Muslim GSM who might migrate to the West to avoid harsh treatment, but might feel trapped due to their experience of racism and anti-Islamic feelings in their host societies. Their distress is compounded by views of their family at home and members of their community in their host country. Additionally, they have to adjust to the differences in the expression of love, lust and romance. As homosexuality is considered a sin in Islam, it might be worth exploring the link between the concept of sin and associated shame in this context. Furthermore, individuals might vary in their level of acculturation and religiosity, and this should be taken into consideration (Joseph and DiDuca, Reference Joseph and DiDuca 2007). Authors are encouraged to further this work by developing a manualized intervention that can be tested through experimental research.
When working cross-culturally, many consider a ‘universalist’ approach to help focus on the similarities across cultures, rather than emphasizing differences (Beck, Reference Beck 2016). This article describes a clinical protocol for supporting those presenting with PTSD and severe dissociative symptoms, particularly dissociative flashbacks, based on a cross-culturally applicable model. The protocol is discussed from the perspective of working with a refugee and asylum seeker population. However, it might be applicable across cultures. The protocol was developed in a specialist NHS (National Health Service, England) programme for migrants with PTSD. The dissociative responses are explained using the ‘6 Fs’ cascade. Currently, a quantitative evaluation is underway.
This brief manualized intervention can be delivered in four sessions and might be applicable across cultures. As language can be a barrier, authors provide some guidance on training interpreters. Both ‘the cultural adaptation of CBT’ that focuses on differences across cultures and a ‘universalist approach focusing on similarities across cultures’ merit further investigation. We are already discovering that behavioural approaches might need few changes in their application across cultures (Alatiq and Alrshoud, Reference Alatiq and Alrshoud 2018). The suggestion that individual variations and environmental factors shape stress response might apply to groups of individuals (Ellis et al., Reference Ellis, Jackson and Boyce 2006). It must also be emphasized that some elements of adaptation are universal, such as adapting to the language needs of the service users. There is a need for more research in culture free aspects of CBT and to test these ideas across cultures.
This paper describes the development of a culturally adapted intervention and outlines a psychological skills group for unaccompanied asylum-seeking children (UASC). The authors also report feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness of the intervention. The principles of CBT underpinned the intervention, with elements of DBT, CFT and ACT. As the UASCs have typically experienced multiple losses, traumatic experiences, significant disruption and psychosocial stressors, a trauma focus approach was used.
The prevalence rates of mental health difficulties among UASC are understandably higher than among children seeking asylum with their families, or children who are not from refugee or asylum-seeking backgrounds. This intervention was planned around three key themes: physical health needs, emotional wellbeing, and resilience-building. The authors considered adaptations at numerous levels. In terms of the mode of delivery, a group approach was considered more suitable to provide peer support and normalization for the UASC. Other notable examples of adaptation include: engagement (games, demonstrations, metaphors), use of interpreters to address the language needs of the group, and considering physical health needs at the start of the intervention. These adaptations are in line with our current knowledge of cultural adaptations described by other authors in this special issue. The next step should be a large scale evaluation of the manualized form of this intervention.
Susana Castaños-Cervantes (Castaños-Cervantes, Reference Castaños-Cervantes 2019) describes the preliminary efficacy of a brief cognitive behavioural group therapy group intervention tailored to Mexican homeless girls. The intervention reduced anxiety, depression and emotional dysregulation, and improved assertiveness. These effects persisted on follow-up. The adaptations were made at structural and didactic levels. Structural adaptations included changes in the language. Didactic adaptations focused on improving engagement and included the use of audiovisual material. Developmental considerations included focusing on concrete concepts, using simplified language, vocabulary, and age-appropriate activities.
The ‘subculture of homelessness’ has been described as the culture of individuals who are homeless and share similar beliefs, values, norms, behaviours, social structures, and a common economic situation, all in response to a comparable living environment (Flaskerud and Strehlow, Reference Flaskerud and Strehlow 2008). Homelessness is often triggered by violence, trauma and adversity in childhood that makes the ‘homeless culture’ attractive in giving status and acceptance to these individuals (Ravenhill, Reference Ravenhill 2008). Flaskerud and Strehlow ( Reference Flaskerud and Strehlow 2008) suggest that apparent apathy and neglect of this highly marginalized, traumatized and disadvantaged population might be due to our belief in individual responsibility, free will and self-determination. As the author rightly points out, the dearth of CBT studies in this area is troubling. There is evidence to suggest that CBT needs to be culturally adapted for the Mexicans (Organista and Muñoz, Reference Organista and Muñoz 1996; Shea et al., Reference Shea, Cachelin, Gutierrez, Wang and Phimphasone 2016) and we therefore envisage that adaptation took place at three levels: (1) for broader Mexican culture, (2) for the homeless, and (3) for the youth. We encourage the authors to share in-depth details of adaptations for application across countries and cultures.
Raphael Kada (Kada, Reference Kada 2019) describes his experience of providing CBT for the Jewish community. Kada suggests adaptations both at the individual therapist level (to make therapy acceptable) and at the service level (to improve access and engagement). They discuss the barriers in access to CBT, such as stigma and racism (mistrust of services and service providers), therapist’s level of awareness (gender, religion and rituals), the religious beliefs (depression occurring only in those who are not genuinely religious) as well as the level of religiosity (Orthodox, Liberal, Conservative and Reform, non-affiliated or secular Jews). Finally, Kada endorses community-based services (Beck and Naz, Reference Beck and Naz 2019), the use of neutral places for therapy, and the importance of social media and online platforms in this context.
This paper offers a wealth of information and insights, and highlights the need for incorporating religious and spiritual factors in formulation and treatment (Josephson, Reference Josephson 2004; Miller, Reference Miller 2004). Some of this information might even be useful when working with service users from other Abrahamic religions. These findings are consistent with North American literature on culturally adapting CBT (Rosen et al., Reference Rosen, Rebeta and Rothschild 2014; Shabtai et al., Reference Shabtai, Pirutinsky, Rosmarin, Ben-Avie, Ives and Loewenthal 2016) and to improve access to mental health services for Jews (McEvoy et al., Reference McEvoy, Williamson, Kada, Frazer, Dhliwayo and Gask 2017). The belief that not being a pious person is associated with depression or anxiety is also common among other religious groups (Mir et al., Reference Mir, Ghani, Meer and Hussain 2019; Naeem et al., Reference Naeem, Phiri, Munshi, Rathod, Ayub, Gobbi and Kingdon 2015a). Similarly, racism as a barrier to access to help and as a cause for the emotional and mental health problem has been previously reported (Rathod et al., Reference Rathod, Kingdon, Phiri and Gobbi 2010; Ward and Brown, Reference Ward and Brown 2015). There is also evidence to suggest that using online platforms for delivering CBT might address cultural barriers (Alavi et al., Reference Alavi, Hirji, Sutton and Naeem 2016). This work encourages us to discuss the client’s religious and cultural beliefs and to engage the client as experts not only in their problems but also in their culture and religion.
Ghazala Mir and co-workers have culturally adapted behavioural activation (BA) for Muslim service users in England. They describe the critical elements of the adapted intervention using case summaries. They describe their experience of successfully training therapists in delivering culturally adapted BA, which supports Muslim service users who choose to use ‘positive religious coping’ as a resource for health. In addition to adapting BA, they have developed a self-help booklet. Therapy was adapted using qualitative methods while maintaining the theoretical underpinning of BA and was found to be feasible and acceptable (Mir et al., Reference Mir, Meer, Cottrell, McMillan, House and Kanter 2015). The intervention is also available online (https://medicinehealth.leeds.ac.uk/downloads/download/131/results_and_resources_for_addressing_depression_in_muslim_communities).
As far as I know, this is the only evidence-based intervention that was adapted for a religious group in England and is being implemented in at least some parts of the service. A systematic review of interventions for treating depression in Muslim patients reported that many studies do not distinguish between beliefs and values that are religious and those that are cultural, and that most of the evidence was methodologically weak or included assertions made without qualification (Walpole et al., Reference Walpole, McMillan, House, Cottrell and Mir 2013). This implies that interventions adapted for religious groups should take into consideration the cultural factors as well. Ghazala Mir and colleagues have very thoughtfully incorporated religious concepts in this intervention, such as self-compassion, hope and taking responsibility for one’s actions, and have addressed misconceptions around religious teachings. Most importantly, they address the cultural issues too. Culture can influence religions, such as a blue-eyed Jesus in Europe and an Indian-looking Jesus in South Asia (Trendpost, 2015). Islam is not an exception, and there are variations in the application of Islamic beliefs in different cultures and traditions (The Economist, 2013). Finally, I agree with the authors that this intervention should be used across the board. Evidence from fully powered trials will help towards implementation not just in England but in Muslim countries too.
In this thought-provoking article, the authors argue that attempts to culturally adapt interventions for Black and Minority ethnic (BME) service users will not have the desired impact if sufficient measures are not in place to improve access to psychological services. They describe some examples from their work to show how the services can better understand the needs of minority populations. The over-arching theme of the paper is the engagement of the BME community in a collaborative manner while addressing stigma and with an emphasis on services being flexible in order to engage BME communities.
This paper highlights the need to improve the BME community’s access to CBT. These ideas have significant implications for equity in terms of service provision. The authors point out that the NICE guidelines do not look at the suitability of cultural adaptations of CBT or how services could be best organized to meet the needs of BME populations. They rightly point out that adaptation work does not suggest changes in mental health care systems. While literature reports perceived barriers to accessing mental health services among BME communities (Memon et al., Reference Memon, Taylor, Mohebati, Sundin, Cooper, Scanlon and Visser 2016), not many models of improving access to psychological services for the BME group exist. Memon et al. ( Reference Memon, Taylor, Mohebati, Sundin, Cooper, Scanlon and Visser 2016) describe factors affecting the relationship between service users and healthcare providers, e.g. poor communication, inadequate recognition or response to mental health needs, cultural naivety, insensitivity and discrimination as well as lack of awareness of different services among service users and providers. I agree that community centres might be a suitable alternative to deal with stigma. This will require establishing trust and partnership with the community. There is a need for further research on a model developed by these authors, which has been tried elsewhere (Baillie et al., Reference Baillie, Harrop, Hopewell-Kelly, Stephens, Byrne and Nelson 2014; CFHI, 2018). In the end, political will, lobbying, public awareness and public demand play an important role in changes in service delivery and improving access to care.
Hakim et al. ( Reference Hakim, Thompson and Coleman-Oluwabusola 2019) explored the experience of four IAPT low-intensity Psychological Wellbeing Practitioners (PWP) who had previously worked as BME Community Mental Health Workers (CMHW). The participants reported that low-intensity CBT (LiCBT) was useful, but only when cultural adaptations were made. They identified six significant themes: training experience in two different roles, the broader context of both services and their accessibility to the BME service users, differences encountered, adapting therapy for BME service users and therapists’ language and cultural expertise not being valued. Authors suggest that there can be significant benefits for services to provide IAPT training to people already providing culturally specific services.
This small-scale study offers in-depth insights based on the experience of front-line workers. They describe their efforts in adapting therapy for their service users on an individual level, barriers to access to IAPT services and lack of training for therapists from majority ethnic backgrounds. It makes common sense that experienced health professionals regardless of their background can offer extra advantages to their service users if they transition to the IAPT. Other authors have suggested the idea that neutral places in the community might improve access to services and engagement with the BME communities (Beck and Naz, Reference Beck and Naz 2019; Kada, Reference Kada 2019). Similarly, their suggestion in adapting CBT is also in line with other papers in this issue. The idea of therapist matching has been a topic of debate; however, research in this area has reported mixed results (Flaskerud, Reference Flaskerud 1990; Lambert, Reference Lambert 2016). Therefore, practical measures to improve access and providing training in culturally adapted therapy might be the most practical way forward. Future research in this area should explore stakeholders’ views on improving access to IAPT services for BME communities.
This paper describes the authors’ experience of delivering training in culturally sensitive CBT, thoughtful commentary on race relations in England, and improving access to CBT for BME clients. The authors provide their perspectives on the terms race, culture and ethnicity and share their understanding of these terms for CBT therapists. They provide best practice guidelines for BME and White therapists, as well as service managers to enable them to work more effectively with service users from different ethnic and cultural backgrounds, for example to consider the current socio-political context. They emphasize the need to provide training and supervision to deliver culturally competent care to BME service users and encourage self-reflection among therapists. They highlight the need for commitment and investment, by all stakeholders, such as therapists, supervisors, clinical leads, service managers, Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) and NHS England. Finally, the authors argue that more resources are required to understand and address the barriers to accessing mental health services for BME service users.
This paper addresses issues above and beyond cultural adaptation of interventions and provides insights into the racial, political and health systems related issues, and most importantly the conflicts these issues can cause among therapists. This article emphasizes the role of mental health services and accreditation bodies. However, this will require a two-pronged approach: improving race relations at a national level and working closely with the accreditation bodies and service providers through canvassing, and emphasizing the role social factors play in the management of emotional and mental health problems. Building an evidence base through high-quality research will further strengthen their argument. Finally, cultural considerations should be an essential part of the CBT courses and training of new CBT therapists. Currently, the IASP (Improving Access to Structures Psychotherapies) CBT Training Program in Ontario, Canada, is incorporating culturally adapted CBT practices.
Andrew Beck starts by presenting evidence that experience of racism can be a cumulative risk factor for developing mental health problems. Therapists often do not discuss service users’ experiences of racism. The author encourages therapists working with BME service users to develop skills to discuss their race, ethnicity, religion and experiences of racism with their service users. This information can then be used to enhance therapeutic alliance and inform formulation and treatment. They offer practical advice on discussing these issues.
Beck discusses issues related to a topic sensitively and compassionately that many might find challenging. Most importantly, he provides practical guidance on how to do this: the appropriate time to make such enquiries, co-developing a genogram, carefully phrasing questions and use of information gathered to guide treatment. While some therapists might be less interested in these topics, others might not explore these areas due to their anxieties around race relations. There are wider cultural variations in self-disclosure. There is at least some evidence that people from some non-Western culture are less likely to self disclose (Chen, Reference Chen 1995; Yoo, Reference Yoo 2012). I encourage the author to develop this work in the form of a training workshop. This area merits further research.
Stone and Arroll report a qualitative study to explore the experiences of therapists trained in CBT in Tanzania. Seven participants from Tanzania’s only psychiatric hospital who had completed CBT training were interviewed. The results of the qualitative analysis found five superordinate themes: the medical model, novelty, practicalities, process and therapist effects. They discuss two themes (‘therapist effects’ and ‘process’) in detail, as they believe these to be particularly relevant to the clinical application of the therapy in this context.
Stone and Warren previously reported the development and implementation of a CBT training course for clinicians working in Tanzania (Stone and Warren, Reference Stone and Warren 2011). Followed by their pioneering work, more studies have been published from Tanzania (O’Donnell et al., Reference O’Donnell, Dorsey, Gong, Ostermann, Whetten, Cohen and Whetten 2014; Woods-Jaeger et al., Reference Woods-Jaeger, Kava, Akiba, Lucid and Dorsey 2017). The findings of Stone and Warren, in particular people in low- and middle-income countries not being aware of the existence of modern psychotherapies and professional’s reliance on a medical model, are in line with published literature (Naeem et al., Reference Naeem, Gobbi, Ayub and Kingdon 2010). It is possible that people presenting with biological symptoms of depression and anxiety attend the modern health facilities, while those with predominantly psychological symptoms or those with a spiritual model of illness, attend faith or religious healers (Naeem, Reference Naeem 2013; Naeem et al., Reference Naeem, Phiri, Munshi, Rathod, Ayub, Gobbi and Kingdon 2015a). Tanzania, like many other low- and middle-income countries, has a long tradition of faith healers (Li, Reference Li 2011). There is a need to improve knowledge of evidence-based therapies through popular electronic and social media, as well as teaching and training health workers.
In this article, Michelle Brooks emphasizes the need for the reflective practice, self-practice and critical incident analysis model when working with service users with complex needs, such as refugees, asylum seekers and survivors of torture attending the IAPT (Improving Access to Psychological Therapies) programme. Brooks identifies some of the challenges that refugees, asylum seekers and survivors of torture may present with. The critical incident analysis model consists of a five-stage process: (1) account of the incident, (2) initial responses to the incident, (3) issues and dilemmas highlighted by this incident, (4) learning and (5) outcomes. Brooks uses a case example to further elaborate the model and emphasize the need for further research in this area.
Therapists working with traumatized individuals are at increased risk of burnout, compassion fatigue and vicarious trauma (Iqbal, Reference Iqbal 2015). When working with refugees, these therapists have to face multiple barriers, such as language, religion and culture. This can indeed increase the risks mentioned above. Self-practice, self-reflection (Chigwedere et al., Reference Chigwedere, Thwaites, Fitzmaurice and Donohoe 2019) and the critical incident analysis model can be useful tools for these therapists. A survey of compassion satisfaction, burnout and secondary traumatic stress of British therapists working with traumatized individuals reported that a higher risk of secondary traumatic stress was predicted in therapists engaging in more individual supervision and self-care activities and those with a personal trauma history (Sodeke-Gregson et al., Reference Sodeke-Gregson, Holttum and Billings 2013). Another survey from Canada reported time spent with trauma victims to be the strongest predictor of the traumatic stress. There was no association between time devoted to coping strategies and traumatic stress scores (Bober and Regehr, Reference Bober and Regehr 2006). I agree with the authors about the need for more research in this area.
Peter Phiri and colleagues present findings from a sub-analysis of a qualitative study to culturally adapt CBT for psychosis for people of Afro-Caribbean and South Asian background (Rathod et al., Reference Rathod, Kingdon, Phiri and Gobbi 2010). Their original study consisted of individual in-depth face-to-face interviews with patients with psychosis (n = 15) and focused groups with lay members (n = 52), CBT therapists (n = 22) and mental health practitioners (n = 25). This paper describes one of the themes from that study in greater detail, i.e. client initiated therapist self-disclosure (TSD). The authors used thematic analysis to further elaborate on critical elements of this theme and how this could impact on (a) therapists’ reaction towards TSD, (b) the therapeutic alliance, and ultimately (c) the outcomes of therapy. They suggest that some BME client groups might test their therapist through initiating TSD. It is not the content of the TSD they are testing per se, but how the therapist responds. In addition to providing some guidance for therapists, Phiri et al. discuss the pros and cons of TSD. They propose further investigation in this area.
As far as I know, this is the first paper to address TSD in a cultural context. Phiri and colleagues used a systematic approach to culturally adapt CBTp (Rathod et al., Reference Rathod, Kingdon, Phiri and Gobbi 2010) in England. This Ca-CBTp was found to be feasible and acceptable as well as effective in a pilot RCT (Rathod et al., Reference Rathod, Phiri, Harris, Underwood, Thagadur, Padmanabi and Kingdon 2013). Based on this initial research and their clinical experience, and in order to further improve strategies to improve therapeutic alliance and engagement, they discuss TSD in this article. However, we should also keep in mind that service users from different cultural backgrounds vary in their tendency to self-disclosure (Chen, Reference Chen 1995; Yoo, Reference Yoo 2012). Their experience of racism, perceived biases and discrimination mean that TSD can play a vital role in building trust and improving engagement (Beck and Naz, Reference Beck and Naz 2019). Therefore, sensitive use of TSD considered to be a useful tool (Goldfried et al., Reference Goldfried, Burckell and Eubanks-Carter 2003) becomes even more critical when working with BME communities.
Human societies are evolving at a fast pace. Globalization is bringing people together, and increasing their knowledge and awareness of the latest technologies in healthcare. Globalization also means rapid mobilization of people across national boundaries. We are becoming more mindful of the need to equal rights of all members of society, and to all societies and cultures and sub-cultures. Therefore, for CBT to stay in the system, it has to evolve, to adapt and even integrate other systems of therapies, in order to address the demands of people with a variety of needs. The original Beckian CBT model has been adapted over the years to help service users with anxiety, PTSD, OCD and psychosis. Third wave therapies are good examples of integration of CBT with another model of therapy. Adaptation of CBT for service users from a variety of cultures and sub-cultures can be seen as an extension of this process. This special issue publishes papers on both adaptation and integration of therapies to fulfil the needs of groups with complex needs and from different cultures and sub-cultures.
It is heartening to see the breadth and width of topics covered in this special issue. The authors have used a variety of approaches to describe their experiences of working with people from diverse backgrounds. Future research must focus on systematically adapting CBT that can be tested through fully powered trials and evaluated for cost-effectiveness. There is also a need to test the culture-free aspects of CBT. Most importantly, a focus on the implementation of adapted CBT, service development and improving access to adapted CBT is required, which can only happen with building the evidence base and advocacy for the right to evidence-based care.